Credit Card Fees: Where are the Free-Market People? |

Interesting comments on   We should debate policy, but we should be clear on the numbers:  Every time a consumer makes a purchase on a credit card, the credit card networks skims a fee off the top.  The fee is typically 2%-3% of the purchase price, but sometimes as high as 15%.  The level of fee relates to the merchant's industry and size and, most crucially, the level of rewards.  Merchants pay more when a customer puts down a cashback/frequent flier super-gold high premium card than when another customer puts down a plain-vanilla card.  As several readers explained, this means that if a customer pays for $100 worth of merchandise at Home Depot with a credit card, the store would keep somewhere between $85 and $98, depending on the card the customer used.

According to research published by Adam Levitin, credit card transactions cost merchants, on average, about six times as much as cash transactions and twice as much as check or PIN-debit card transactions.

Because Mastercard and Visa prevent it, the merchant doesn't have the option to charge $10 extra to use a credit card rather than cash, even if the credit card costs the merchant $10 more. 

The numbers cited in Save $6 Billion came from different sources.  The report on the total dollars for these fees ($57 billion) came from .  The numbers for convenience stores and gasoline purchases ($6.6 billion in fees, 65-86 cents per transaction came from ).  I estimated the cash costs based on the  on the relative costs of cash and credit cards. 

We've had some really good posts, but, if I may, I want to re-frame the question just slightly:  Whatever your views of credit cards and consumers, why shouldn't merchants be allowed to pass along higher costs of credit cards--and pass along the savings when customers use cash?  I know how the consumer advocates feel about this, but where are the free market people?  Why aren't those who believe in unrestricted markets jumping up and down over this restraint on trade and demanding that merchants be allowed to determine their own pricing structures?  Isn't this an issue on which two ends of the political spectrum should unite? 

Credit-card miles: Flight to nowhere

Dear Dave,

I'm a senior in college, and my roommate just got a credit card that features airline miles. He want me to get one, too, so we can take a trip together at the end of the year. What do you think about this idea?

Tim

Dear Tim,

This is a bad idea on so many different levels. First, you're close to graduation and beginning your real life. You don't want to start out with a bunch of hanging over your head.

Second, have you seen the restrictions on airline miles lately? Jupiter has to align with Mars while you're standing on one leg to cash in on those things. It's ridiculous! Plus, statistics from Consumer Reports show that 78 percent of all airline miles are never redeemed. What does this mean? It means in most cases people end up with no cool trip and a bunch of debt.

(Column continues below)

I'm not against going nice places and having fun, and you probably deserve to celebrate a little after finishing college. But going into debt for it is a really bad idea.

Just for a trip, Tim. Today, many debit cards have airline miles associated with them. So there's no reason to take a chance with credit cards.

Dave

Long-term disability insurance?

Dear Dave,

My husband is 31 years old and has been offered long-term disability insurance through his employer. It only costs $25 a month, but we're trying hard to live on a budget and get out of debt. Is this coverage worth it?

Rebecca

Dear Rebecca,

Yes!

is a fantastic buy. It's inexpensive, and in return it will pay you about 60 to 70 percent of his salary if something bad happens and he becomes disabled. That's not a bad deal for just $300 a year.

Statistics show that a man in his early 30s is 12 times more likely to become disabled than to die before the age of 65. Everyone needs to have long-term – not short-term – disability insurance.

Hopefully, you'll never find yourselves in a situation where you have to use this type of policy. But in the event that something awful does happen, it can help save you from financial ruin!

Dave

Perpetual debt

Dear Dave,

My father-in-law is telling us we should apply for an interest-only loan when we buy a house and then pay extra on the principle. What do you think about this idea?

Nick

Dear Nick,

Interest-only mortgages are horrible. Stay away from them!

Lots of folks get into these traps by promising themselves they'll pay extra on the principle. But according to FDIC statistics, 97 percent don't pre-pay on their loans.

Some lenders will also try to use a flashy or "sophisticated" analysis to convince you this is a great way to get into a great house. But the funny thing about most of these sales pitches is that there's no mention of the fact that you've exponentially increased risk. And risk can be mathematically entered into the equation, making your supposed gains disappear.

The best thing you can do – short of saving up and paying cash for a home – is make a huge down payment on a . Then, pay it off as quickly as possible.

When you have an interest-only loan, you end up paying only on the interest. And that's a great way to find yourself in debt for the rest of your life!

Dave